Browsing by Author "Batista, Guilherme Augusto Sousa"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Body fat indicators for cardiometabolic risk screening among shift workers.(2020) Diniz, Amanda Popolino; Alves, Márcia Elivane; Fajardo, Virgínia Capistrano; Freitas, Silvia Nascimento de; Batista, Guilherme Augusto Sousa; Athadeu, Bruno Francia Maia; Coelho, George Luiz Lins Machado; Oliveira, Fernando Luiz Pereira de; Pimenta, Fausto Aloísio Pedrosa; Nascimento Neto, Raimundo Marques doBackground: In view of the costly methods currently available for the assessment of body adiposity, anthropometric obesity indicators have proven effective in predicting cardiovascular risk. Objective: To investigate the discriminatory power of body fat indicators for cardiovascular risk screening among shift workers. Methods: Cross-sectional study with male employees of an iron ore extraction company. The predictive power of body fat indicators relative to cardiovascular risk was analyzed based on the Framingham risk score and metabolic syndrome by means of receiver operating characteristic curves, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and Youden’s index. Results: The prevalence of cardiovascular risk was 14.2% in the metabolic syndrome risk model. According to the Framingham score, 95.0%, 4.1% and 0.9% of the participants exhibited low, moderate and high risk, respectively. All the analyzed body fat indicators exhibited satisfactory discriminatory power for the tested cardiovascular risk models. Conclusion: Waist-height ratio exhibited the highest ability to predict cardiometabolic risk in both risk models.Item Treatment of keloids : a literature review.(2019) Corrêa, Pedro Martins; Passos, Camila Eugênia Fonseca; Souza, Eduardo Mesquita de; Batista, Guilherme Augusto Sousa; Jacintho, Jessica de Oliveira; Oliveira, Luiza Barbosa de; Lisboa, Oscar Campos; Lima, Joyce de Sousa FioriniIntroduction: Keloids are characterized by an abnormal response to dermal trauma, resulting in fibroblast proliferation, excessive collagen production, and impairment of adjacent healthy tissue. The diagnosis is clinical, and many conservative and surgical methods can be used as treatments. However, data on the efficacy of these treatments are limited, and there is no consensus regarding the best treatment option. This gap needs to be filled by developing comprehensive evidence-based therapies. Methods: A non-systematic literature review of keloid scars was carried out using PubMed, Scielo, MEDLINE, UptoDate, and dermatology and dermatological surgery textbooks. Literature review: The search retrieved relevant information on surgical and adjuvant therapies used for keloids, including excision, intralesional injections, cryotherapy, laser therapy, silicone gel sheeting, radiation therapy, and pressure therapy. These data are crucial because, in addition to complaints of pain, itching, and restriction of movement, the main reason for seeking treatment for keloids is for cosmetic and aesthetic improvement, and the rates of recurrence and treatment failure are high, emphasizing the importance of creating awareness regarding the available procedures and their effectiveness. Conclusion: Many surgical and adjuvant therapies for keloids are available. Nonetheless, there is no consensus on a universally accepted treatment. Therefore, additional high-quality studies are needed to identify the most effective therapeutic approaches to achieve better results.